lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Future projects
Date Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:52:23 GMT
4) An additional possibly contrib module is caching the results of
TermQueries.  In looking at the TermQuery code would we need to cache the
entire docs and freqs as arrays which would be a memory hog?

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherglen@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Now that LUCENE-1516 is close to being committed perhaps we can
> figure out the priority of other issues:
>
> 1. Searchable IndexWriter RAM buffer
>
> 2. Finish up benchmarking and perhaps implement passing
> filters to the SegmentReader level
>
> 3. Deleting by doc id using IndexWriter
>
> With 1) I'm interested in how we will lock a section of the
> bytes for use by a given reader? We would not actually lock
> them, but we need to set aside the bytes such that for example
> if the postings grows, TermDocs iteration does not progress to
> beyond it's limits. Are there any modifications that are needed
> of the RAM buffer format? How would the term table be stored? We
> would not be using the current hash method?
>

Mime
View raw message