lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Earwin Burrfoot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1584) Callback for intercepting merging segments in IndexWriter
Date Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:59:15 GMT


Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1584:

.bq I'd like to step back and understand the wider use case / context that's driving this
need (to know precisely when segments got merged)
This is required in one form or another for any kinds of segment-aware caches.
We're currently using our own field cache (I doubt we'll ever switch back to lucene's native,
fixed one or not) and filter cache. Both caches are warmed up on reopen, asynchronously from
search requests and both would warm up considerably faster if we have data on how segments
have changed.

> Callback for intercepting merging segments in IndexWriter
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1584
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1584.patch
>   Original Estimate: 96h
>  Remaining Estimate: 96h
> For things like merging field caches or bitsets, it's useful to
> know which segments were merged to create a new segment.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message