lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1539) Improve Benchmark
Date Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:48:47 GMT


Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1539:

I think it should mean "delete XXX% of the remaining
undeleted docs"?

Yeah? Ok. So the deleteDocsByPercent method needs to somehow
take into account whether it's deleted before by adjusting the
doc nums it's deleting?

I don't think we can relax that. This (single transaction
(writer) open at once) is a core assumption in Lucene.

True, however doesn't mean we have to stick with it, especially
internally. Hopefully we can move to a more componentized model
someone could change this if they wanted. Perhaps in the
flexible indexing revamp?

> Improve Benchmark
> -----------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1539
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/benchmark
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1539.patch, LUCENE-1539.patch, LUCENE-1539.patch, LUCENE-1539.patch,,
>   Original Estimate: 336h
>  Remaining Estimate: 336h
> Benchmark can be improved by incorporating recent suggestions posted
> on java-dev. M. McCandless' Python scripts that execute multiple
> rounds of tests can either be incorporated into the codebase or
> converted to Java.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message