lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1596) optimize MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs
Date Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:47:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12698142#action_12698142
] 

Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1596:
--------------------------------------

Yes, *if* you are doing low level stuff directly on the MultiReader, like using TermEnum/TermDocs.
 Or calling Filter.getBits(multiReader).  As you probably know, if you pass Filters or Queries
to an IndexSearcher, it's now dropping down to the segment level already (a scorer is created
per-segment) so it won't hit the MultiTermEnum code.



> optimize MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1596
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1596
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>            Assignee: Yonik Seeley
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1596.patch
>
>
> Optimize MultiTermEnum and MultiTermDocs to avoid seeks on TermDocs that don't match
the term.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message