lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1596) optimize MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs
Date Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:47:14 GMT


Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1596:

Yes, *if* you are doing low level stuff directly on the MultiReader, like using TermEnum/TermDocs.
 Or calling Filter.getBits(multiReader).  As you probably know, if you pass Filters or Queries
to an IndexSearcher, it's now dropping down to the segment level already (a scorer is created
per-segment) so it won't hit the MultiTermEnum code.

> optimize MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1596
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>            Assignee: Yonik Seeley
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1596.patch
> Optimize MultiTermEnum and MultiTermDocs to avoid seeks on TermDocs that don't match
the term.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message