Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of earwin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.158 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=JH53MNGLCKmd17esxe54knUxyV9P+YeyWnC1CE8iKWUpqi1Z9W+uvUUKrEdDsv9SxH
         dMPSUI9xmGdretD2A5AXFsMz8fpeYZz6bqFK10vuIu679ycnPhbAaJd10yR1BlEDxBDN
         xD7QMKqMafx8CEyDn1T/7vFR91RczQFszmdgc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3AF11F54-8649-4283-80F3-D61E752BBE09@gmail.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903201846280.25951@radix.cryptio.net>
	 <786fde50903230929o1493d67cxc3b3cf8fbe5e2ef5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9ac0c6aa0903231156h50238132uaf7b9800ad2c87d9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <786fde50903240547o748ec151le91f5be2e423f110@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9ac0c6aa0903241051l272a6653he0580ed1e495dab4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <786fde50903241329u18a0ea3cm7ca21219c5491d90@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9ac0c6aa0903250638g351f8c4aw4a55ec1f0ea165cc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <786fde50903251155j4a07bb85l81c5a25731875f02@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9ac0c6aa0903260355y70b6cd97q96baef0ca97ca64a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3AF11F54-8649-4283-80F3-D61E752BBE09@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:19:28 +0300
Message-ID: <59b3eb370903260519k1c4e08c5he92bf4d6542096c7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is TopDocCollector's collect() implementation correct?
From: Earwin Burrfoot <earwin@gmail.com>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'd say it is a bad name. Raw hit is way far from being result of a search.

If you're already breaking back compat with 3.0 release (by
incrementing java version), maybe its worthy to break it in some more
places, just so ugly names like MRHC and special code paths that check
for n-year-old interfaces won't haunt us for the next century.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:15, DM Smith <dmsmith555@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> =C2=A0think we need to deprecate HC, in favor of MRHC (or if we can thin=
k
>> of a better name... ResultCollector?).
>
> I like your suggestion for the name.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


--=20
Kirill Zakharenko/=D0=9A=D0=B8=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BB =D0=97=D0=B0=D1=85=
=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BA=D0=BE (earwin@gmail.com)
Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
ICQ: 104465785

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org