Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91986 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2009 10:44:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2009 10:44:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 53304 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2009 10:44:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 53267 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2009 10:44:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 53257 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2009 10:44:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:44:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.190.230.99] (HELO mail.troja.net) (80.190.230.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:44:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D1750EB5 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:43:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.troja.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cyca.troja.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31399-01 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:43:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from VEGA (unknown [134.102.249.74]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB50350EB0 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:43:44 +0100 (CET) From: "Uwe Schindler" To: References: <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147F13FCA251@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu> <75818254-FCF0-4955-9503-A4BB43B4C53F@mikemccandless.com> <0FC6A8013A0C4DD4B58C7B4D49A0F882@VEGA> <9F999A90-FB9B-4D6E-BEEB-2771C87E033C@mikemccandless.com> Subject: RE: Iterable in FieldCacheTermsFilter (LUCENE-1487) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:43:47 +0100 Message-ID: <286C959FF22C4E6DB18362A703156BC7@VEGA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <9F999A90-FB9B-4D6E-BEEB-2771C87E033C@mikemccandless.com> Thread-Index: AcmctWx+StI12nUYQuKxvrdcNXi0CAAAH+kQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The simpliest would be to simply try compiling with an old java 1.4 before releasing 2.9. We could add this to the release howto in wiki. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:38 AM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Iterable in FieldCacheTermsFilter (LUCENE-1487) > > > Maybe... though I would really prefer to spend our collective energy > towards releasing 2.9 instead ;) Hmm, we've got 41 issues for 2.9 > right now: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode= > hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=- > 1&pid=12310110&fixfor=12312682 > > Mike > > Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > Maybe this is the way to go until Lucene 3.0: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-718 > > > > Is it a problem to copy 1.4 rt.jar to Hudson and specify it in > > build.xml? > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > > > >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:50 PM > >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Iterable in FieldCacheTermsFilter (LUCENE-1487) > >> > >> > >> Gak, you're right! > >> > >> I'll fix. > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> Steven A Rowe wrote: > >> > >>> FieldCacheTermsFilter on trunk uses Iterable, a language feature not > >>> present in Java 1.4. This is counter to the policy of maintaining > >>> Java 1.4 compatibility until the Lucene 3.0 release, isn't it? > >>> > >>> Steve > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org