lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andi Vajda <va...@osafoundation.org>
Subject Re: move TrieRange* to core?
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:08:18 GMT

On Mar 18, 2009, at 13:01, Michael McCandless  
<lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> I think we should move TrieRange* into core before 2.9?
>
> It's received alot of attention, from both developers (Uwe & Yonik did
> lots of iterations, and Solr is folding it in) and user interest.
>
> It's a simpler & more scalable way to index numeric fields that you
> intend to sort and/or do range querying on; we can do away with tricky
> number padding.
>
> Plus it's just plain cool :)
>
> I also think we should change its name.  I know and love "trie", but
> it's a very technical term that's not immediately meaningful to users
> of Lucene's API.  Plus I've learned from doing too many renamings
> lately that it's best to try to get the name right at the start.
>
> Maybe just NumberUtils, IntRangeFilter, LongRangeFilter,
> AbstractNumberRangeFilter?

+1

How about NumericRangeFilter ?

Andi..

>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message