lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <>
Subject Re: LIA2 on l.a.o/java OK?
Date Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:27:40 GMT
On Feb 20, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Isn't that what is  
> for?  I like LIA as much as the next person,  but if we do it for  
> LIA2 then it opens the door for others (

> ) which will likely clutter the page quite a bit.

There is precedent.  Other books do make it to Apache sites.  iBatis  
has the Manning cover in the lower-left sidebar: < 
 >.  Wicket has three big book covers: <>.   
Struts more subtly: <>.  ActiveMQ has a news  
blurb with big book cover: <>

As for other books making it there... that'd be fine by me to have a  
few book covers shown on the home page.  I imagine we won't hear other  
authors even asking.

>  I just don't think we can imply that LIA2 is the "official book on  
> Lucene".

It's the only book dedicated exclusively to Lucene that I'm aware of,  
and all of the co-authors are committers/PMC members and active  
members of the community.  It's about as "official" as it gets.

Books on open source projects lend a great deal of credibility and  
I've seen first hand that they are used as deciding factors when  
choosing a technology.  A book means it is mature and has a good  

Personal bias noted - I support putting it on the home page, and also  
news blurbs when there is activity, like when it goes to print and is  
available in hardcopy.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message