lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1537) InstantiatedIndexReader.clone
Date Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:20:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12674316#action_12674316
] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1537:
------------------------------------------

bq. handle non-optimized readers

Why is it that the incoming reader must be optimized?  I did try to change this and ran into
issues.

bq. Perhaps we should move deleted documents to the reader?

That makes sense.  Was there a reason to have it in both?

bq. Is this refactor just for debugging purposes

It is for debugging.  

> InstantiatedIndexReader.clone
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1537
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1537
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/*
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
>            Assignee: Karl Wettin
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1537.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> This patch will implement IndexReader.clone for InstantiatedIndexReader.  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message