lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1487) FieldCacheTermsFilter
Date Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:10:44 GMT


Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1487:

Hold out Tim, your likely to get further comments before it goes in. I think Otis was just
suggesting we start with those changes. Once your code is in the right format, your more likely
to get a committer to spend some time with it. Sometimes we just reformat and add the tests
ourselves depending on a host of factors, but in general, your more likely to get good comments
 faster if that work has already been done.

Its a fair question to ask if the idea is sound, but just posting the work doesn't necessarily
imply that you are looking for that advice before putting more work into what you have done.
And many times questions do go unanswered, they are missed, people don't have the time at
the moment - so its best to supply all of this stuff, unless you are prepared for a wait if
their is no current interest in going over the patch.

> FieldCacheTermsFilter
> ---------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1487
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>            Reporter: Tim Sturge
>             Fix For: 2.9
>         Attachments:
> This is a companion to FieldCacheRangeFilter except it operates on a set of terms rather
than a range. It works best when the set is comparatively large or the terms are comparatively

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message