lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrzej Bialecki ...@getopt.org>
Subject Luke bugs (Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1454) Corrupted index produced by lucene 2.4)
Date Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:17:03 GMT
Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
>     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647960#action_12647960
] 
> 
> Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1454:
> --------------------------------------------
> 
> You're right, Luke is saying that!
> 
> But, that's a misleading error -- here are the sources in Luke for that error:
> 
> {code}
> fn = ir.getFieldNames(IndexReader.FieldOption.ALL);
> if (fn.size() == 0) {
>     errorMsg("Invalid or corrupted index.");
>     return;
> }
> {code}
> 
> So, what Luke really means is there are 0 fields found in the index, ie it's an empty
index.

You're lucky that I spotted this message ... ;)

I'll fix it in the next minor release of Luke, pretty soon.

However, in the future please notify me about any suspected bugs in 
Luke, otherwise I may miss reports like this.

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
  ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message