lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Busch (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1448) add getFinalOffset() to TokenStream
Date Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:44:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12648080#action_12648080
] 

Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1448:
---------------------------------------

{quote}
First: this patch only addresses the final offset, but shouldn't we also address the final
position? Eg if StopFilter removes the last few tokens, shouldn't we make it possible to report
those skipped positonIncrements?
{quote}

Hmm now that we have getPositionIncrementGap() and getOffsetGap(), I think it would make sense
to also add getFinalPositionIncrement()?

{quote}
To fix this, I'd like to add a new getFinalOffset() to TokenStream.
{quote}

Could we add this as Attributes using the new API? FinalOffsetAttribute and FinalPositionIncrementAttribute?

> add getFinalOffset() to TokenStream
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1448.patch, LUCENE-1448.patch, LUCENE-1448.patch, LUCENE-1448.patch
>
>
> If you add multiple Fieldable instances for the same field name to a document, and you
then index those fields with TermVectors storing offsets, it's very likely the offsets for
all but the first field instance will be wrong.
> This is because IndexWriter under the hood adds a cumulative base to the offsets of each
field instance, where that base is 1 + the endOffset of the last token it saw when analyzing
that field.
> But this logic is overly simplistic.  For example, if the WhitespaceAnalyzer is being
used, and the text being analyzed ended in 3 whitespace characters, then that information
is lost and then next field's offsets are then all 3 too small.  Similarly, if a StopFilter
appears in the chain, and the last N tokens were stop words, then the base will be 1 + the
endOffset of the last non-stopword token.
> To fix this, I'd like to add a new getFinalOffset() to TokenStream.  I'm thinking by
default it returns -1, which means "I don't know so you figure it out", meaning we fallback
to the faulty logic we have today.
> This has come up several times on the user's list.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message