Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22374 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2008 20:59:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2008 20:59:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 17819 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2008 20:59:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 17693 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2008 20:59:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 17684 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2008 20:59:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:59:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:58:09 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740BF234C21D for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1400092614.1223845126474.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:58:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul Elschot (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation In-Reply-To: <521761508.1222889624375.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12638900#action_12638900 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -------------------------------------- So there's roughly a factor 2 between PFOR and BITS (which is actually just FOR i.e. PFOR without patches/exceptions). Meanwhile I've started working on speeding up the patching, combined with always using a multiple of 4 bytes. This also involves changing the layout for the exceptions slightly, but it should allow faster patching and avoid the byte ordering problems mentioned before. It will take another while to finish. > PFOR implementation > ------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1410 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Other > Reporter: Paul Elschot > Priority: Minor > Attachments: autogen.tgz, LUCENE-1410b.patch, LUCENE-1410c.patch, TermQueryTests.tgz, TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java > > Original Estimate: 21840h > Remaining Estimate: 21840h > > Implementation of Patched Frame of Reference. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org