lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Elschot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation
Date Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:58:46 GMT


Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410:

So there's roughly a factor 2 between PFOR and BITS (which is actually just FOR i.e. PFOR
without patches/exceptions). Meanwhile I've started working on speeding up the patching, 
combined with always using a multiple of 4 bytes. This also involves changing the layout for
the exceptions slightly, but it should allow faster patching and avoid the byte ordering problems
mentioned before. It will take another while to finish.

> PFOR implementation
> -------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1410
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Other
>            Reporter: Paul Elschot
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: autogen.tgz, LUCENE-1410b.patch, LUCENE-1410c.patch, TermQueryTests.tgz,,,
>   Original Estimate: 21840h
>  Remaining Estimate: 21840h
> Implementation of Patched Frame of Reference.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message