Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92225 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2008 21:53:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2008 21:53:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12835 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2008 21:53:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 12785 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2008 21:53:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 12774 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2008 21:53:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:53:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:52:41 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FDE234C1E1 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1212005544.1221861164539.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:52:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jay Es (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-427) PrefixQuery.extractTerms() missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632837#action_12632837 ] Jay Es commented on LUCENE-427: ------------------------------- Yes, the patch works for the PrefixQuery class. I guess there could be other classes without this functionality. I don't have the resources to check them atm, but I could look into it tomorrow. This is of course unless you already know what classes are influenced by this bug. Thanks for the quick reply. > PrefixQuery.extractTerms() missing > ---------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-427 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Search > Affects Versions: CVS Nightly - Specify date in submission > Environment: Operating System: All > Platform: All > Reporter: Mikko Noromaa > Assignee: Lucene Developers > Priority: Minor > Attachments: PrefixQuery.diff > > > RC1.9 on 2005-08-21. I will attach a patch to add my version of extractTerms(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org