From java-dev-return-27070-apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Sun Aug 31 09:06:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87947 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2008 09:06:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2008 09:06:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 20190 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2008 09:06:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20151 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2008 09:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20142 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2008 09:06:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:06:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.29] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:05:28 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so134340ywj.5 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:05:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=1wZ2mhQtCRjroUD7JlaHYZqAK54wTvFeVnFcPLjdCUo=; b=foJnGWDbJdm3qriIeR8N9uCyBdZS+vymeCw71sOhjc19NbRHhFSNY4FAzcn4rMjAqZ RLwXtLpu5F9i2nPG0njfB5tvUXCxkEMHG2pKOc79v4IpMyceXK3U7ThAM4E6dwJkCeAn uSnLXGqHdqnHTH6Aq83Y9eaFC9NMvev9I+uLk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=On/cYF66o4wAtksLkQuSq2EKIO3tG1cdx/VcZRZKTrvQeh1vhL8tfBGTDAtPPbnEks seRncK50JlBFH5b93V3jE7vjqSHJY8NMGr3cIpZOGSIes3jQK6Ipk26UPLqpAdKRAh6H +z3Bj7b5BR6L7sdHyRip9EId6chK2lnwhv94U= Received: by 10.150.202.9 with SMTP id z9mr1744240ybf.54.1220173548922; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.219.7 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4d0b24970808310205o2773a3c2h8c9998695f9d0a9b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:05:48 +0800 From: "Andrew Zhang" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Make auto fix delay configurable in CheckIndex.checkIndex? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_18845_14577875.1220173548930" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_18845_14577875.1220173548930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Currently, CheckIndex.checkIndex sleeps 5 seconds before fixing corrupted index. Does it make sense to make it configurable? Some applications just want to fix it asap. -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang db4o - database for Android: www.db4o.com http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/ ------=_Part_18845_14577875.1220173548930 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,

Currently, CheckIndex.checkIndex sleeps 5 seconds before fixing corrupted index. Does it make sense to make it configurable? Some applications just want to fix it asap.

--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang

db4o - database for Android: www.db4o.com
http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/
------=_Part_18845_14577875.1220173548930--