Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42804 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2008 00:19:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2008 00:19:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 85463 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2008 00:18:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85399 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2008 00:18:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85386 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2008 00:18:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:18:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:18:13 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0CB234C0C2 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <711193251.1207786566842.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hoss Man (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1260) Norm codec strategy in Similarity In-Reply-To: <1445780161.1207599325798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12587435#action_12587435 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1260: ---------------------------------- bq. My use case is really about document boost and not normalization. bq. So another solution to this is to introduce a (variable bit sized?) document boost file and completely separate it from the norms instead... 1) "norms" is a vague term. currently "lengthNorm" is folded in with "field boosts" and "doc boosts" to form a generic "fieldNorm" ... I assumed you were interested in a more general way to improve the resolution of "fieldNorm" 2) your description of general purpose variable sized document boosting sounds exactly like LUCENE-1231 ... in the long run utilities using LUCENE-1231 (or something like it) to replace "field boosts" and "length norms" might make the most sense as a way to eliminate the current static Norm encoding and put more flexibility in the hands of users > Norm codec strategy in Similarity > --------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Search > Affects Versions: 2.3.1 > Reporter: Karl Wettin > Attachments: LUCENE-1260.txt > > > The static span and resolution of the 8 bit norms codec might not fit with all applications. > My use case requires that 100f-250f is discretized in 60 bags instead of the default.. 10? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org