lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1269) Analysers and Filters should not be final
Date Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:57:21 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591893#action_12591893
] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1269:
-----------------------------------------

Can you submit a patch?  I guess I don't see any reason they need to be final, but I am always
paranoid that somebody had to have a reason at the time.

> Analysers and Filters should not be final
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1269
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.1
>            Reporter: C├ędrik LIME
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I am trying to extend some Lucene Analysers to further improve their behaviour. However,
some Analysers and Filters are final classes that I cannot extend (thus resorting to copying
the class, which is less than optimal).
> Any reason we would want to inhibit people from extending a class like FrenchAnalyzer?
> Could me make all Analysers and Filters in the contrib-analysis package non-final?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message