Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64830 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 19:53:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 19:53:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 60880 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 19:53:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60814 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 19:53:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60803 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2008 19:53:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:53:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cdoronc@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.154] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:52:46 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1832555fga.27 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=kNbq4GQ40jWxWHLYxdolRHnP+KYkmdhumUQKT5rG1Tw=; b=INMARwET01DARMsFeIsuE1PCgSs6nPa3xu1875+ybq5ndaNbbhSWLL3tN8FBk0oXf0kCBng9OsU6NZLbbmqDDBL3gM5Vi2QjihzgxCCmEX6lKkGPXaqDwnWuZRdPVYWzyFqdUDY9/FkBZrv43ZHzeXbhql8YIU5Hd1LUCO0vBBM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GD1Sv3arRCX0EMZfz+TX/WmoSesQuzdE2SnH5/KV43WXXY3dFstS1e0vs0vTmTaRoXxjo3TEWFXbPumcTt7MYIXteCVfCOX9J7AK2ImMbPJTG6UolpYQcEhZuKTyWPMGPD1LoKkd4ezZjNGsSmm34FgenPTuOCkOjRZPEzImMKg= Received: by 10.86.80.5 with SMTP id d5mr6935385fgb.20.1205178776067; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.91.5 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:52:56 +0200 From: "Doron Cohen" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Going to Java 5. Was: Re: A bit of planning In-Reply-To: <47D58A39.80402@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_12348_10930524.1205178776071" References: <818426B2-8C2C-4E6C-AB61-C01B6FC07B2D@apache.org> <47894B0D.1030700@gmail.com> <47894CF8.9080006@gmail.com> <9E5E7C49-0386-4D45-A4B6-A82B4A4821F0@gmail.com> <1F50556A-B604-48C6-9F84-38FCB4E4457B@apache.org> <47D58A39.80402@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_12348_10930524.1205178776071 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:21 PM, DM Smith wrote: > Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > We voted to make 3.0 Java 1.5, full well knowing that it will break > > the back compat. requirements. I don't see the point of postponing it > > or dragging it out. > > I thought his suggestion was to skip 3.0 as a designator and instead use > 4.0. If so, the schedule would not change. > Right, that's what I meant: * 2.9 with deprecations, * 3.0 removing deprecated stuff but still Java 1.4, * 4.0 first Java 5 version But I am catching up now a looong list of discussions and missed this vote, so I am ok with taking this back and proceed as voted. - Doron ------=_Part_12348_10930524.1205178776071--