Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72507 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2008 01:25:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2008 01:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 91735 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2008 01:25:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91671 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2008 01:25:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91656 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2008 01:25:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:25:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:25:02 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95CE234C0AD for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1570029406.1206840204889.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:23:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mark Miller (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1243) A few new benchmark tasks In-Reply-To: <2091122828.1206235644486.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12583388#action_12583388 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1243: ------------------------------------- Yeah, sorry about that Grant. Did not mean for that change to go in, just wanted it as a stumbling block to thinking about good sort field data. At the time I needed to test non String data and there was none. So ... please ignore that change. Perhaps the best way is a new DocMaker for good sort data? > A few new benchmark tasks > ------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1243 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1243 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/benchmark > Reporter: Mark Miller > Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Attachments: benchmark-tasks.diff > > > Some tasks that would be helpful to see added. Might want some expansion, but here are some basic ones I have been using: > CommitIndexTask > ReopenReaderTask > SearchWithSortTask > I do the sort in a similar way that the highlighting was done, but another method may be better. Just would be great to have sorting. > Also, since there is no great field for sorting (reuters date always appears to be the same) I changed the id field from doc+id to just id. Again maybe not the best solution, but here I am to get the ball rolling :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org