lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1241) 0xffff char is not a string terminator
Date Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:25:26 GMT


Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1241:

Woops, sorry.  I can take over?  I'll start from your patch, update to the current trunk,
and fold in my feedback above, then test performance.

> 0xffff char is not a string terminator
> --------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1241
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Hiroaki Kawai
>         Attachments:, LUCENE-1241.patch
> Current trunk index.DocumentWriter uses "\uffff" as a string terminator, but it should
not to be for some reasons. \uffff is not a terminator char itself and we can't handle a string
that really contains \uffff. And also, we can calculate the end char position in a character
sequence from the string length that we already know.
> However, I agree with the usage for assertion, that "\uffff" is placed after at the end
of a string in a char sequence.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message