Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <24541490.1202407269949.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:01:09 -0800 (PST)
From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1084) increase default maxFieldLength?
In-Reply-To: <25336561.1197067003215.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566717#action_12566717 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1084:
--------------------------------------------

This looks good!  Thanks Steven.  I'll commit.

> increase default maxFieldLength?
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1084
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>            Reporter: Daniel Naber
>            Assignee: Steven Rowe
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1084.part2.patch, LUCENE-1084.part2.take2.patch, LUCENE-1084.patch
>
>
> To my understanding, Lucene 2.3 will easily index large documents. So shouldn't we get rid of the 10,000 default limit for the field length? 10,000 isn't that much and as Lucene doesn't have any error logging by default, this is a common problem for users that is difficult to debug if you don't know where to look.
> A better new default might be Integer.MAX_VALUE.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org