lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: Background Merges
Date Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:42:09 GMT

Awesome, thanks!!

I'll track it down...

Mike

suresh guvvala wrote:

> I think, I have a test case to reproduce java.io.IOException: read  
> past EOF execption while merging. The attached code generates this  
> exception upon executing it.
>
> Suresh.
>
>
> On 12/19/07, Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> > The field that is causing the problem in the stack trace is neither
> > binary nor compressed, nor is it even stored.
>
> This would also be possible with the one bug I found on hitting an
> exception in DocumentsWriter.addDocument.
>
> Basically the bug can cause only a subset of the stored fields to be
> added to the fdt file even though the vint header claimed more stored
> fields were written.  Grant, you're really sure you saw no exception
> in Solr's logs right?  Note that the exception would corrupt the
> index but would then not be detected until that corrupted segment
> gets merged, so it could have been in an earlier batch of added docs,
> for example.
>
> I've been testing various combinations of changing schema, turning on/
> off stored for the same field, interested deletions, empty stored
> fields, etc, and can't otherwise get the bug to come out.  It's a
> sneaky one!
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> <TestCase.java>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message