Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99981 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2007 06:06:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2007 06:06:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 43741 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 06:05:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43694 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 06:05:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43683 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2007 06:05:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:05:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:06:59 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C9F71422B for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:05:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3555062.1195020347797.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:05:47 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Busch (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-743) IndexReader.reopen() In-Reply-To: <2046210.1165877241108.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542333 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-743: -------------------------------------- {quote} So how about a public IndexReader.flush() method {quote} Since our goal is it to make IndexReader read-only in the future (LUCENE-1030), do you really think we need to add this? > IndexReader.reopen() > -------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-743 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Reporter: Otis Gospodnetic > Assignee: Michael Busch > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.3 > > Attachments: IndexReaderUtils.java, lucene-743-take2.patch, lucene-743-take3.patch, lucene-743-take4.patch, lucene-743-take5.patch, lucene-743-take6.patch, lucene-743-take7.patch, lucene-743-take8.patch, lucene-743.patch, lucene-743.patch, lucene-743.patch, MyMultiReader.java, MySegmentReader.java, varient-no-isCloneSupported.BROKEN.patch > > > This is Robert Engels' implementation of IndexReader.reopen() functionality, as a set of 3 new classes (this was easier for him to implement, but should probably be folded into the core, if this looks good). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org