Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91708 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2007 05:23:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2007 05:23:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7336 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 05:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 7295 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 05:22:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 7284 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2007 05:22:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:22:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:23:54 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46886714240 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:22:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <31796316.1195017763285.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:22:43 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Busch (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1051) Separate javadocs for core and contribs In-Reply-To: <15361587.1194830090798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542322 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1051: --------------------------------------- I'm planning to commit this tomorrow... any objections? Did anyone look at the preview yet? > Separate javadocs for core and contribs > --------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1051 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Javadocs > Reporter: Michael Busch > Assignee: Michael Busch > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.3 > > Attachments: lucene-1051-take2.patch, lucene-1051.patch > > > A while ago we had a discussion on java-dev about separating the javadocs > for the contrib modules instead of having only one big javadoc containing > the core and contrib classes. > This patch: > * Adds new targets to build.xml: > ** "javadocs-all" Generates Javadocs for the core, demo, and contrib > classes > ** "javadocs-core" Generates Javadocs for the core classes > ** "javadocs-demo" Generates Javadocs for the demo classes > ** "javadocs-contrib" Using contrib-crawl it generates the Javadocs for > all contrib modules, except "similarity" (currently empty) and gdata. > * Adds submenues to the Javadocs link on the Lucene site with links to > the different javadocs > * Includes the javadocs in the maven artifacts > Remarks: > - I removed the ant target "javadocs-internal", because I didn't want to > add corresponding targets for all new javadocs target. Instead I > defined a new property "javadoc.access", so now > "ant -Djavadoc.access=package" can be used in combination with any of > the javadocs targets. Is this ok? > - I didn't include gdata (yet) because it uses build files that don't > extend Lucenes standard build files. > > Here's a preview: > http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/site-preview/index.html > Please let me know what you think about these changes! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org