Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92153 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2007 18:36:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2007 18:36:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 63090 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2007 18:35:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63035 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2007 18:35:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63023 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2007 18:35:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:35:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:35:49 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA1B71420E for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:35:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <15074038.1195756543106.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:35:43 -0800 (PST) From: "Paul Elschot (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet In-Reply-To: <27200586.1149076109798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-584: -------------------------------- Attachment: (was: Matcher-20071008-1ground.patch) > Decouple Filter from BitSet > --------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-584 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Search > Affects Versions: 2.0.1 > Reporter: Peter Sch=C3=A4fer > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bench-diff.txt, bench-diff.txt, Matcher-20070905-2de= fault.patch, Matcher-20070905-3core.patch, Matcher-20071122-1ground.patch, = Some Matchers.zip > > > {code} > package org.apache.lucene.search; > public abstract class Filter implements java.io.Serializable=20 > { > public abstract AbstractBitSet bits(IndexReader reader) throws IOExcept= ion; > } > public interface AbstractBitSet=20 > { > public boolean get(int index); > } > {code} > It would be useful if the method =3DFilter.bits()=3D returned an abstract= interface, instead of =3Djava.util.BitSet=3D. > Use case: there is a very large index, and, depending on the user's privi= leges, only a small portion of the index is actually visible. > Sparsely populated =3Djava.util.BitSet=3Ds are not efficient and waste lo= ts of memory. It would be desirable to have an alternative BitSet implement= ation with smaller memory footprint. > Though it _is_ possibly to derive classes from =3Djava.util.BitSet=3D, it= was obviously not designed for that purpose. > That's why I propose to use an interface instead. The default implementat= ion could still delegate to =3Djava.util.BitSet=3D. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org