lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-693) ConjunctionScorer - more tuneup
Date Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:25:47 GMT
On Nov 23, 2007 1:01 PM, robert engels <rengels@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> BUT, more importantly and an FYI, the statement that "it is a
> bottleneck because of the 'size of norms array contained in it'" is
> not correct.

Sure... the original reporter made a mistake.  He was correct about
where the time was going though.  Instead of trying to optimize the
sort, I simply eliminated it.
But your first response today, "I don't understand this", seems like
you have an issue with the patch I just committed.  Is this still the
case?

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message