lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Payload API
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:31:47 GMT
On Nov 19, 2007 1:21 PM, Michael Busch <buschmic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yonik Seeley wrote:
> > On Nov 19, 2007 11:38 AM, Michael McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >>> If we opt to treat payload like termBuffer and copy the bytes, then we
> >>> need no offset member.
>
> I'd argue that the current approach (creating a very lightweight wrapper
> object that is immutable for every payload) should yield a better
> performance than a buffer+copy approach (admittedly without having
> numbers that proof this).

Immutable implies that the user needs to do a new byte[] for every payload, yes?
It seems like this would be slower if payloads were common and faster
if very rare.

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message