lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-693) ConjunctionScorer - more tuneup
Date Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:56:23 GMT
No, the patch is fine. I got confused because I was reading the  
original problem report. My problem - not yours.

On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

> On Nov 23, 2007 1:01 PM, robert engels <rengels@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> BUT, more importantly and an FYI, the statement that "it is a
>> bottleneck because of the 'size of norms array contained in it'" is
>> not correct.
>
> Sure... the original reporter made a mistake.  He was correct about
> where the time was going though.  Instead of trying to optimize the
> sort, I simply eliminated it.
> But your first response today, "I don't understand this", seems like
> you have an issue with the patch I just committed.  Is this still the
> case?
>
> -Yonik
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message