lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Busch <>
Subject Re: Payload API
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:52:17 GMT
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> So I think we all agree to do payloads by reference (do not make a
> copy of byte[] like termBuffer does), and to allow payload reuse.
> So now we still have 3 viable options still on the table I think:
> Token{ byte[] payload, int payloadLength, ...}
> Token{ byte[] payload, int payloadOffset, int payloadLength,...}
> Token{ Payload p, ... }

I'm for option 2. I agree that it is worthwhile to allow filters to
modify the payloads. And I'd like to optimize for the case where lot's
of tokens have payloads, and option 2 seems therefore the way to go.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message