lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Busch (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1051) Separate javadocs for core and contribs
Date Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:50:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542542
] 

Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1051:
---------------------------------------

{quote}
Are many folks using Lucene's gdata server? If no one is using it, and it's not maintained,
then it should probably be dropped from trunk. If someone decides to start maintaining it
later, then they could update it and re-add it to trunk.
{quote}

+1

> Separate javadocs for core and contribs
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1051
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Michael Busch
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3
>
>         Attachments: lucene-1051-take2.patch, lucene-1051.patch
>
>
> A while ago we had a discussion on java-dev about separating the javadocs
> for the contrib modules instead of having only one big javadoc containing 
> the core and contrib classes.
> This patch:
> * Adds new targets to build.xml: 
>   ** "javadocs-all" Generates Javadocs for the core, demo, and contrib 
>     classes
>   ** "javadocs-core" Generates Javadocs for the core classes
>   ** "javadocs-demo" Generates Javadocs for the demo classes
>   ** "javadocs-contrib" Using contrib-crawl it generates the Javadocs for 
>     all contrib modules, except "similarity" (currently empty) and gdata.
> * Adds submenues to the Javadocs link on the Lucene site with links to
>   the different javadocs
> * Includes the javadocs in the maven artifacts
> Remarks:
> - I removed the ant target "javadocs-internal", because I didn't want to
>   add corresponding targets for all new javadocs target. Instead I 
>   defined a new property "javadoc.access", so now  
>   "ant -Djavadoc.access=package" can be used in combination with any of
>   the javadocs targets. Is this ok?
> - I didn't include gdata (yet) because it uses build files that don't 
>   extend Lucenes standard build files.
>   
> Here's a preview:
> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/site-preview/index.html
> Please let me know what you think about these changes!

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message