lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1017) BoostingTermQuery performance
Date Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:50:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531974
] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1017:
-----------------------------------------

Can you do the BoostingTermQuery as a patch too, that way it will be easy to compare it against
the current one?  I don't recall seeing a package on the java file.  Can you put it in the
source tree and svn add it and then do svn diff.

Also, I notice you commented out setFreqCurrentDoc(), how is it that you are handling multiple
payloads per document (that bit me the first time)?



> BoostingTermQuery performance
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1017
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1017
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Peter Keegan
>         Attachments: BoostingTermQuery.java, termquery.patch
>
>
> I have been experimenting with payloads and BoostingTermQuery, which I think are excellent
additions to Lucene core. Currently, BoostingTermQuery extends SpanQuery. I would suggest
changing this class to extend TermQuery and refactor the current version to something like
'BoostingSpanQuery'.
> The reason is rooted in performance. In my testing, I compared query throughput using
TermQuery against 2 versions of BoostingTermQuery - the current one that extends SpanQuery
and one that extends TermQuery (which I've included, below). Here are the results (qps = queries
per second):
> TermQuery:    200 qps
> BoostingTermQuery (extends SpanQuery): 97 qps
> BoostingTermQuery (extends TermQuery): 130 qps
> Here is a version of BoostingTermQuery that extends TermQuery. I had to modify TermQuery
and TermScorer to make them public. A code review would be in order, and I would appreciate
your comments on this suggestion.
> Peter

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message