lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-743) IndexReader.reopen()
Date Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:58:50 GMT


Hoss Man updated LUCENE-743:

    Attachment: varient-no-isCloneSupported.BROKEN.patch

a rough variation on Michael's latest patch that makes the changes along two of the lines
i was suggesting before reagrding FilterIndexReader and ising "instanceof Cloneable" instead
of "isCloneSupported()" two important things to note:

1) i didn't change any of the documentation, i was trying to change as little aspossibel so
the two patches could be compared side-by-side

2) this patch is currently broken.  TestIndexReaderReopen gets an exception i can't understand
... but i have to stop now, and i wanted to post what i had in case people had comments. that i've done this exercise, i'm not convinced that it's a better way to go, but it
does seem like isCloneSupported isn't neccessary, that's the whole point of the Cloneable

> IndexReader.reopen()
> --------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-743
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Otis Gospodnetic
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3
>         Attachments:, lucene-743-take2.patch, lucene-743.patch,
lucene-743.patch, lucene-743.patch,,, varient-no-isCloneSupported.BROKEN.patch
> This is Robert Engels' implementation of IndexReader.reopen() functionality, as a set
of 3 new classes (this was easier for him to implement, but should probably be folded into
the core, if this looks good).

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message