Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30841 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2007 01:24:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2007 01:24:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 91917 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 01:24:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91572 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 01:24:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91556 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2007 01:24:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:24:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 01:24:16 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1FE714187 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6842529.1186536239498.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:23:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstantiatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index In-Reply-To: <33188999.1145512002000.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518291 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-550: ---------------------------------------- Hey Karl, I started to look at this, but there are a few stoppers at this point for me: 1. No build file 2. Tests are virtually non-existent It could also use some documentation, especially on the how and why of the InstantiatedIndex. Cheers, Grant > InstantiatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-550 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Store > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Karl Wettin > Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > Attachments: HitCollectionBench.jpg, lucene-550.jpg, LUCENE-550_20070804_no_core_changes.txt, test-reports.zip, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2, trunk.diff.bz2 > > > An non file centrinc all in memory index. Consumes some 2x the memory of a RAMDirectory (in a term satured index) but is between 3x-60x faster depending on application and how one counts. Average query is about 8x faster. IndexWriter and IndexModifier have been realized in InterfaceIndexWriter and InterfaceIndexModifier. > InstantiatedIndex is wrapped in a new top layer index facade (class Index) that comes with factory methods for writers, readers and searchers for unison index handeling. There are decorators with notification handling that can be used for automatically syncronizing searchers on updates, et.c. > Index also comes with FS/RAMDirectory implementation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org