Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18029 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2007 22:13:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2007 22:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 55983 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 22:13:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55940 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 22:13:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55929 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2007 22:13:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:13:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of karl.wettin@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.188] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:13:42 +0000 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so298673muf for ; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:13:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=RvwczKlxvkUMqowB9516P5S2T9+vZ8IicyEnBA/G7sOyMjepe0//2yBSMv1CZ2vFbtTXJ3PuMw8dNVsi1gH1NUUUPX+g/Fehouwc/e1ZoUtvMAMCn6y8Owr2GVHb/CzWAhbGKL6LeloB4Ns76mXZrktQUeQyQofOxR74bPImtKM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=h/7kd3T/CT02xuIr984bo5YHTeLrhk9ETi4y6SNvtmeZxesWI1Cy1/pp1s1Vclprtw3mWLA+eSqUX7CdxAIGuXt1FQSMc1eir4nGuKxx2QZm88ZwBg1JM9OcvNBcPochZhm8NOev1bDU3idRLfVSB6yW0rgQnL3n7NoVeL79sJk= Received: by 10.86.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr649502fgd.1186611200219; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ( [83.249.118.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j12sm2098044fkf.2007.08.08.15.13.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <3F21BC00-9BE4-4052-8B0E-99C1B889BA16@aconex.com> References: <3F21BC00-9BE4-4052-8B0E-99C1B889BA16@aconex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2A47F799-416F-4A7F-87D2-A906432642ED@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: karl wettin Subject: Re: maven snapshots available for 2.3? Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 00:08:40 +0200 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 8 aug 2007 kl. 23.58 skrev Paul Smith: > I'm thinking no, but just in case, are lucene 2.3 snapshots > published anywhere, or should I build one locally? There have been some discussion on keeping a snapshot repository somewhere, but never more than that. So for now you need to build it locally. > > More broadly, is there any plan to fully Mavenize the lucene > trunk ? I'm not sure if anyone had a chance to look the patch I > supplied a while back with a pom.xml that appeared to build and > test ok. I'm happy to pitch in here. See for more details. There are also some old threads on the subject, dating back more than a year. -- karl --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org