Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48035 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2007 18:56:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2007 18:56:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 26124 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2007 18:56:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26103 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2007 18:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26090 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2007 18:56:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:56:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:56:15 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F6D71420D for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10076092.1186080952833.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:55:52 -0700 (PDT) From: "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer In-Reply-To: <7545374.1185455200156.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517339 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-966: ---------------------------------------- +1 for deprecating StandardAnalyzer, although it is a little weird to have a StandardAnalyzer2, which is it the standard or not? Maybe we could call it the DefaultAnalyzer or something like that. I never much cared for tacking on numbers on the end of class names. I agree with Mike M's last comment and approach, though, if that proves to be the case for the differences. > A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-966 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Analysis > Reporter: Stanislaw Osinski > Fix For: 2.3 > > Attachments: AnalyzerBenchmark.java, jflex-analyzer-patch.txt, jflex-analyzer-r560135-patch.txt, jflex-analyzer-r561292-patch.txt, jflex-analyzer-r561693-compatibility.txt > > > JFlex (http://www.jflex.de/) can be used to generate a faster (up to several times) replacement for StandardAnalyzer. Will add a patch and a simple benchmark code in a while. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org