Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37678 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2007 21:38:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2007 21:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 76558 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 21:38:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76512 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 21:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76501 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2007 21:38:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:38:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:38:15 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865E3714168 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10005562.1186522679546.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-847) Factor merge policy out of IndexWriter In-Reply-To: <24621308.1174677392992.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518263 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847: ------------------------------------------- > I'm thinking maybe a MergePolicy#useCompoundDocStore( SegmentInfos ) > makes sense? The naive case would still just use the static setting > we have now, but we could think about a better implementation: I think adding that new method to MergePolicy is great! And, just using the same "useCompoundFile" as normal segmetns is good for starters (and, this matches what's done today). > Factor merge policy out of IndexWriter > -------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-847 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Reporter: Steven Parkes > Assignee: Steven Parkes > Attachments: concurrentMerge.patch, LUCENE-847.patch.txt, LUCENE-847.txt > > > If we factor the merge policy out of IndexWriter, we can make it pluggable, making it possible for apps to choose a custom merge policy and for easier experimenting with merge policy variants. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org