lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer
Date Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:55:52 GMT


Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-966:

+1 for deprecating StandardAnalyzer, although it is a little weird to have a StandardAnalyzer2,
which is it the standard or not?  Maybe we could call it the DefaultAnalyzer or something
like that.  I never much cared for tacking on numbers on the end of class names.  

I agree with Mike M's last comment and approach, though, if that proves to be the case for
the differences.

> A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-966
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Stanislaw Osinski
>             Fix For: 2.3
>         Attachments:, jflex-analyzer-patch.txt, jflex-analyzer-r560135-patch.txt,
jflex-analyzer-r561292-patch.txt, jflex-analyzer-r561693-compatibility.txt
> JFlex ( can be used to generate a faster (up to several times) replacement
for StandardAnalyzer. Will add a patch and a simple benchmark code in a while.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message