Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <3426800.1182463228179.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Doron Cohen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-937) Make CachingTokenFilter faster
In-Reply-To: <20416739.1182460946299.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12507044 ] 

Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-937:
------------------------------------

Good catch, patch look good to me.
It makes sense to modify anyhow, but just wondering, - what is the performance difference?

While we're looking at this, I noticed three other uses of LinkedList that can be changed to ArrayList: 
  - DocumentWriter
  - CompoundFileWriter
  - MultipleTermPositions


> Make CachingTokenFilter faster
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-937
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-937
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: CachingTokenFilter.patch
>
>
> The wrong data structure was used for the CachingTokenFilter. It should be an ArrayList rather than a LinkedList. There is a noticeable difference in speed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org