Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98799 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 14:03:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 14:03:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 96116 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 14:03:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 96069 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 14:03:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 96052 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2007 14:03:51 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:03:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:03:47 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDDE714186 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <25910744.1181052206580.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT) From: "Karl Wettin (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-622) Provide More of Lucene For Maven In-Reply-To: <5697584.1152061409765.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501565 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-622: ------------------------------------ Grant Ingersoll - [04/Jun/07 08:05 AM ] > How does Karl's patch compare to Sami's? I didn't look in to Samis, I just cleaned up mine and poped it in here as an alternative when I saw the action. His deploys jars built by Ant to a Maven repository. Mine is a bunch of POM skeletons that gathers the code from the Ant-structured SVN trunk so that one can use Maven to build, test and deploy (and itegrate with my development environment and all the other things it does for me). There are most probably some problem with some test. Mavens test plugin require a bit of configuration to avoid all automagic things it does. The lucene-tests/pom.xml contains comments on that. lucene-demo shoudl probably be worked a bit more, it really only contains the source code that some other things depends on (tests mostly). Perhaps someone that knows webthings could fix the resource dir and all so it could build a deployable war-file or something. I don't know. The only thing I can think of that can be a major pain is to apply a trunk patch that span multiple projects. Never had to do that though. It is running smooth over here. > Provide More of Lucene For Maven > -------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-622 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-622 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Stephen Duncan Jr > Assignee: Michael Busch > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: lucene-622.txt, lucene-core.pom, lucene-highlighter-2.0.0.pom, lucene-maven.patch, lucene-maven.tar.bz2 > > > Please provide javadoc & source jars for lucene-core. Also, please provide the rest of lucene (the jars inside of "contrib" in the download bundle) if possible. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org