lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-622) Provide More of Lucene For Maven
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:05:38 GMT


Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-622:

How does Karl's patch compare to Sami's?  I haven't looked in-depth at either yet. I will
try to at some point.  Karl seems to be saying it has poms for each of the contribs, etc.
which is probably easier to maintain.  This whole bolting on of Maven to ANT just seems a
little weird to me.

FYI, Hoss, the way to validate the POM is by using Maven!  :-)  It does it for you.

I am beginning to think we should try having a parallel build for a little bit in order for
people to test out the different approaches.  I think the committers doing releases will see
the biggest win from Maven, but I am not 100% sure.  If Karl's patch achieves this, then I
think we could use it as the basis for doing the evaluation.

> Provide More of Lucene For Maven
> --------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-622
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Stephen Duncan Jr
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>             Fix For: 2.2
>         Attachments: lucene-622.txt, lucene-core.pom, lucene-highlighter-2.0.0.pom, lucene-maven.patch,
> Please provide javadoc & source jars for lucene-core.  Also, please provide the rest
of lucene (the jars inside of "contrib" in the download bundle) if possible.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message