lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Busch <>
Subject Re: Maven artifacts for Lucene.*
Date Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:33:10 GMT
 > > Whatever files also need to be included along with the jars in order to
 > > make the maven distribution complete that can't be built completley
 > > dynamicly (ie: the md5 files) can certainly be commited into the
 > > repository ... but if making a release requires a lot of manual 
upating to
 > > those files, it's going to be a hinderane to the process ... things 
 > > version number and date should ideally be filled in via variables 
to help
 > > keep things automated.

 > This starts to sound like a plan that can work. I'll see if I can hack
 > something up as a patch fow a review. Do you think poms should live in a
 > separate dir or should they be spread across dirs (modules).

Hi Sami,

as you may have noticed we're aiming for a Lucene 2.2 release in about two
weeks and as it looks like I will be acting as RM. I'd like to get the maven
upload right this time, but I admit that I don't have much experience with
maven in general. I'll try to get familiar with it during the next days, but
some help will definitely be useful.

I already committed LUCENE-802 (patch from Steven Parkes) that adds
LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT to the Lucene jars. I think what remains is to
have our ant script generate the poms for maven, right? Have you made 
with your patch yet?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message