lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-908) MANIFEST.MF cleanup (main jar and luci customizations)
Date Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:59:26 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Hoss Man updated LUCENE-908:
----------------------------

    Description: 
there are several problems with the MANIFEST.MF file used in the core jar, and some inconsistencies
in th luci jar:

Lucli's build.xml has an own "jar" target and does not use the jar target from common-build.xml.
The result
is that the MANIFEST.MF file is not consistent and the META-INF dir does not contain LICENSE.TXT
and NOTICE.TXT.

Is there a reason why lucli behaves different in this regard? If not I think we should fix
this.

  was:
Is there a particular reason why lucli has it's own MANIFEST.MF file? Lucli's build.xml
has an own "jar" target and does not use the jar target from common-build.xml. The result
is that the MANIFEST.MF file does not contain infos like "Created-By Apache Lucene Java",
neither does META-INF contain LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT.

Is there a reason why lucli behaves different in this regard? If not I think we should fix
this.

        Summary: MANIFEST.MF cleanup (main jar and luci customizations)  (was: Lucli doesn't
include standard MANIFEST.MF)

> MANIFEST.MF cleanup (main jar and luci customizations)
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-908
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-908
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build
>            Reporter: Michael Busch
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.2
>
>
> there are several problems with the MANIFEST.MF file used in the core jar, and some inconsistencies
in th luci jar:
> Lucli's build.xml has an own "jar" target and does not use the jar target from common-build.xml.
The result
> is that the MANIFEST.MF file is not consistent and the META-INF dir does not contain
LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT.
> Is there a reason why lucli behaves different in this regard? If not I think we should
fix this.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message