lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sami Siren (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-622) Provide More of Lucene For Maven
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:32:27 GMT


Sami Siren commented on LUCENE-622:

thanks Hoss for the feedback in general. I am now a bit confused - is there a consensus how
to proceed with this (in other words should I change things as suggested or are we going to
take the maven approach to this?)

> some other questions:
>  a) it doesn't seem like all contribs are accounted for ... were some excluded intentionally?

Some were excluded intentionally as their dependencies are not available in public repos (gdata,
db), some were just excluded(javascript, lucli, ant)

> (my worry is that overtime a contrib
> changes, it's POM doesn't get updated, and we have a "release" in which the maven artifacts
are incorrect (which
> in my opinion is worse then not having any maven artifacts at all)

for 1.9.1 the jar itself was faulty

> Provide More of Lucene For Maven
> --------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-622
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Stephen Duncan Jr
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>             Fix For: 2.2
>         Attachments: lucene-622.txt, lucene-core.pom, lucene-highlighter-2.0.0.pom, lucene-maven.patch,
> Please provide javadoc & source jars for lucene-core.  Also, please provide the rest
of lucene (the jars inside of "contrib" in the download bundle) if possible.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message