lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: updating the forrest docs?
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:04:23 GMT

On Jun 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:


>
> Looking at the diffs for docs/index.html it seems like the site has  
> gone
> back and forth between 0.7 and 0.8 the past week or so depending on  
> who is
> updating it (gsingers is using 0.7 and buschmi is using 0.8) and  
> not all
> of the files on the trunk are actually consistent ... some were  
> generated
> with 0.7 and some with 0.8.  Which raises some questions:
>
> 1) Is it safe to say we should pick a version and stick with it, and
> update all docs at the same time so we don't have a mix of versions  
> and a
> lot of commits consisting just of template changes like these...
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/docs/demo.html? 
> r1=548640&r2=548896
>
> 2) do we still want to use 0.7?  If so, does anyone understand the  
> forrest
> plugin mechanism well enough to explain how to ensure you get the  
> "good"
> version of the pdf plugin (ie: whichever one doesn't barf on our  
> xdocs)
>
> 3) do we want to start using 0.8?  If so, then question for  
> Michael: how
> did you manage to get 0.8 to work for you with sitemap.xmap file we  
> have
> committed?  when I just flat out deleted my local copy of it,  
> forrest 0.8
> seemed to work fine -- but it's hard to be sure there were no bad side
> effects since the svn diff is so big (with many files going from  
> 0.7 to
> 0.8)

I think it makes sense to move to 0.8.

-Grant

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message