lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Naber (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (LUCENE-882) Spellchecker doesn't need to store ngrams
Date Thu, 17 May 2007 21:02:16 GMT
Spellchecker doesn't need to store ngrams
-----------------------------------------

                 Key: LUCENE-882
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-882
             Project: Lucene - Java
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Other
    Affects Versions: 2.1
            Reporter: Daniel Naber
         Attachments: lucene-spellchecker.diff

The spellchecker in contrib stores the ngrams although this doesn't seem to be necessary.
This patch changes that, I will commit it unless someone objects. This improves indexing speed
and index size. Some numbers on a small test I did:

Input of the original index: 2200 text files, index size 5.3 MB, indexing took 17 seconds

Spell index before patch: about 60.000 documents, index size 13 MB, indexing took 62 seconds
Spell index after patch: about 60.000 documents, index size 6.3 MB, indexing took 52 seconds

BTW, the test case fails even before this patch. I'll probaby submit another issue about how
to fix that.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message