Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13308 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2007 11:32:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2007 11:32:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 56231 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2007 11:33:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55680 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2007 11:33:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55669 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2007 11:33:02 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:33:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.109.24.29] (HELO smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 04:32:54 -0700 Received: from k8l.lan (porta.xs4all.nl [80.127.24.69]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l36BWWRs040265 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:32:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from paul.elschot@xs4all.nl) From: Paul Elschot To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: TestIndexWriter.testAddIndexOnDiskFull failed Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:32:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200704051940.39047.paul.elschot@xs4all.nl> <1175796698.21832.1183238448@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1175796698.21832.1183238448@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704061332.32624.paul.elschot@xs4all.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thursday 05 April 2007 20:11, Michael McCandless wrote: > > "Paul Elschot" wrote: > > At revision 525912: ... > > I just got a fresh checkout and the test is passing. That's one scary output > from the test (input index disk usage). It seems like RAMDirectory.fileLength(...) > may be returning a bad (incorrectly immense) result in your checkout? It occurred to me that I only ran the test once, so I reran it. It had the same result, so the problem does not seem to be in the hardware of my test machine. I'll take a further look into this in a week or two. Thanks for the pointer to get me going. Regards, Paul Elschot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org