Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80519 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2007 19:32:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2007 19:32:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 49809 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 19:32:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 49757 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 19:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 49745 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2007 19:32:42 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:32:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:32:35 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE789714076 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <11824787.1176838335777.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael Busch (JIRA)" To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-834) Payload Queries In-Reply-To: <24216971.1174133529481.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489519 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-834: -------------------------------------- Hi Grant, cool that you started implementing queries that use of payloads! I have a question about this one: BoostingTermQuery only takes the payload of the first term position into account for scoring. Could you explain why you implemented it this way? Shouldn't we rather compute the average of the payload values of all positions? > Payload Queries > --------------- > > Key: LUCENE-834 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Search > Reporter: Grant Ingersoll > Assigned To: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Attachments: boosting.term.query.patch > > > Now that payloads have been implemented, it will be good to make them searchable via one or more Query mechanisms. See http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Payload_Planning for some background information and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755 for the issue that started it all. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org