lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Klaas" <mike.kl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-843) improve how IndexWriter uses RAM to buffer added documents
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:02:20 GMT
On 4/5/07, Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:
>
> : Thanks!  But remember many Lucene apps won't see these speedups since I've
> : carefully minimized cost of tokenization and cost of document retrieval.  I
> : think for many Lucene apps these are a sizable part of time spend indexing.
>
> true, but as long as the changes you are making has no impact on the
> tokenization/docbuilding times, that shouldn't be a factor -- that should
> be consiered a "cosntant time" adjunct to the code you are varying ...
> people with expensive analysis may not see any significant increases, but
> that's their own problem -- people concerned about performance will
> already have that as fast as they can get it, and now the internals of
> document adding will get faster as well.

Especially since it is relatively easy for users to tweak the analysis
bits for performance--compared to the messy guts of index creation.

I am eagerly tracking the progress of your work.

-Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message