lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Doron Cohen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:14:32 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487667
] 

Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-584:
------------------------------------

> No Scorer, no BooleanScorer(2), no ConjunctionScorer... 

Thanks, I was reading "score" instead of "score()"...

But there is a scorer in the process, it is used for next()-ing to matched docs. So most of
the work - preparing to be able to compute the scores - was done already. The scorer doc queue
is created and populated. Not calling score() is saving the (final) looping on the scorers
for aggregating their scores, multiplying by coord factor, etc. I assume this is why only
a small speed up is seen. 


> Decouple Filter from BitSet
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-584
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>            Reporter: Peter Schäfer
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: bench-diff.txt, bench-diff.txt, BitsMatcher.java, Filter-20060628.patch,
HitCollector-20060628.patch, IndexSearcher-20060628.patch, MatchCollector.java, Matcher.java,
Matcher20070226.patch, Scorer-20060628.patch, Searchable-20060628.patch, Searcher-20060628.patch,
Some Matchers.zip, SortedVIntList.java, TestSortedVIntList.java
>
>
> {code}
> package org.apache.lucene.search;
> public abstract class Filter implements java.io.Serializable 
> {
>   public abstract AbstractBitSet bits(IndexReader reader) throws IOException;
> }
> public interface AbstractBitSet 
> {
>   public boolean get(int index);
> }
> {code}
> It would be useful if the method =Filter.bits()= returned an abstract interface, instead
of =java.util.BitSet=.
> Use case: there is a very large index, and, depending on the user's privileges, only
a small portion of the index is actually visible.
> Sparsely populated =java.util.BitSet=s are not efficient and waste lots of memory. It
would be desirable to have an alternative BitSet implementation with smaller memory footprint.
> Though it _is_ possibly to derive classes from =java.util.BitSet=, it was obviously not
designed for that purpose.
> That's why I propose to use an interface instead. The default implementation could still
delegate to =java.util.BitSet=.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message